- 05 Jun, 2017 30 commits
-
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46550, 46663, 46816, 46820, 46460) [GCE] Support internal load balancers **What this PR does / why we need it**: Allows users to expose K8s services externally of the K8s cluster but within their GCP network. Fixes #33483 **Important User Notes:** - This is a beta feature. ILB could be enabled differently in the future. - Requires nodes having version 1.7.0+ (ILB requires health checking and a health check endpoint on kube-proxy has just been exposed) - This cannot be used for intra-cluster communication. Do not call the load balancer IP from a K8s node/pod. - There is no reservation system for private IPs. You can specify a RFC 1918 address in `loadBalancerIP` field, but it could be lost to another VM or LB if service settings are modified. - If you're running an ingress, your existing loadbalancer backend service must be using BalancingMode type `RATE` - not `UTILIZATION`. - Option 1: With a 1.5.8+ or 1.6.4+ version master, delete all your ingresses, and re-create them. - Option 2: Migrate to a new cluster running 1.7.0. Considering ILB requires nodes with 1.7.0, this isn't a bad idea. - Option 3: Possible migration opportunity, but use at your own risk. More to come later. **Reviewer Notes**: Several files were renamed, so github thinks ~2k lines have changed. Review commits one-by-one to see the actual changes. **Release note**: ```release-note Support creation of GCP Internal Load Balancers from Service objects ```
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue HPA Status Conditions This PR introduces conditions to the status of the HorizontalPodAutoscaler (in autoscaling/v2alpha1). The conditions whether or not the autoscaler is actively scaling, and why. This gives greater visibility into the *current* status of the autoscaler, similarly to how conditions work for pods, nodes, etc. `kubectl describe` has been updated to the display the conditions affecting a given HPA. Implements kubernetes/features#264 (alpha in 1.7) **Release note**: ```release-note Introduces status conditions to the HorizontalPodAutoscaler in autoscaling/v2alpha1, indicating the current status of a given HorizontalPodAutoscaler, and why it is or is not scaling. ```
-
Anirudh Ramanathan authored
make the health check wait for ready apiservices
-
deads2k authored
-
Solly Ross authored
This commit updates the generated autoscaling files to be up-to-date with the HPA status condition changes.
-
Solly Ross authored
This commit updates `kubectl describe` to display the new HPA status conditions. This should make it easier for users to discern the current state of the HPA.
-
Solly Ross authored
This commit causes the HPA controller to set a variety of status conditions using the new `Status.Conditions` field of autoscaling/v2alpha1. These provide insight into the current state of the HPA, and generally correspond to similar events being emitted.
-
Solly Ross authored
This commit adds the new API status conditions to the API types. The field exists as a field in autoscaling/v2alpha1, and is round-tripped through an annotation in autoscaling/v1.
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46734, 46810, 46759, 46259, 46771) Added node to persistent-volume-binder clusterrole **What this PR does / why we need it**: Added missing permission to volume-binder clusterrole **Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes #46770 **Special notes for your reviewer**: Non **Release note**: Non
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46734, 46810, 46759, 46259, 46771) Add iptables lock-file mount to kube-proxy manifest **What this PR does / why we need it**: kube-proxy is broken in make bazel-release. The new iptables binary uses a lockfile in "/run", but the directory doesn't exist. This causes iptables-restore to fail. We need to share the same lock-file amongst all containers, so mount the host /run dir. This is similar to #46132 but expediency matters, since builds are broken. **Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #46103 **Special notes for your reviewer**: **Release note**: ```release-note ```
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46734, 46810, 46759, 46259, 46771) Improve code coverage for pkg/kubelet/images/image_gc_manager **What this PR does / why we need it**: #39559 #40780 code coverage from 74.5% to 77.4% **Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes # **Special notes for your reviewer**: **Release note**: ```release-note NONE ```
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46734, 46810, 46759, 46259, 46771) Update the COS kernel sha for node e2e gpu installer cc @mindprince Relevant COS image - https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e_node/jenkins/image-config-serial.yaml#L19
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46734, 46810, 46759, 46259, 46771) OpenAPI aggregation for kube-aggregator This PR implements OpenAPI aggregation layer for kube-aggregator. On each API registration, it tries to download swagger.spec of the user api server. On failure it will try again next time (either on another add or get /swagger.* on aggregator server) up to five times. To merge specs, it first remove all unrelated paths from the downloaded spec (anything other than group/version of the API service) and then remove all unused definitions. Adding paths are straightforward as they won't have any conflicts, but definitions will most probably have conflicts. To resolve that, we would reused any definition that is not changed (documentation changes are fine) and rename the definition otherwise. To use this PR, kube aggregator should have nonResourceURLs (for get verb) to user apiserver. ```release-note Support OpenAPI spec aggregation for kube-aggregator ``` fixes: #43717
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45871, 46498, 46729, 46144, 46804) PD e2e test: Ready node check now uses the most up-to-date node count. Follow-up to PR #46746 <!-- Steps to write your release note: 1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access) 2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45871, 46498, 46729, 46144, 46804) Implement kubectl rollout undo and history for DaemonSet ~Depends on #45924, only the 2nd commit needs review~ (merged) Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/527/ TODOs: - [x] kubectl rollout history - [x] sort controller history, print overview (with revision number and change cause) - [x] print detail view (content of a history) - [x] print template - [x] ~(do we need to?) print labels and annotations~ - [x] kubectl rollout undo: - [x] list controller history, figure out which revision to rollback to - if toRevision == 0, rollback to the latest revision, otherwise choose the history with matching revision - [x] update the ds using the history to rollback to - [x] replace the ds template with history's - [x] ~(do we need to?) replace the ds labels and annotations with history's~ - [x] test-cmd.sh @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews @erictune @kow3ns @lukaszo @kargakis @kubernetes/sig-cli-maintainers --- **Release note**: ```release-note ```
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45871, 46498, 46729, 46144, 46804) Enable some pod-related admission plugins for kubemark Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/44701 This should help reduce discrepancy in "list pods" latency wrt real cluster. Let's see. /cc @wojtek-t @gmarek
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45871, 46498, 46729, 46144, 46804) Fix some comments in dnsprovider **What this PR does / why we need it**: **Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes # **Special notes for your reviewer**: **Release note**: ```release-note NONE ```
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue delete the useless "gv" in Errorf Signed-off-by:yupengzte <yu.peng36@zte.com.cn> **What this PR does / why we need it**: Fix "no formatting directive in Errorf call" **Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes # **Special notes for your reviewer**: **Release note**: ```release-note ```
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43852, 44255) Bump github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure **What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR bump revision of github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure. The library is required by Gophercloud, also they has passed tests with the newer revision. So, since Gophercloud is update, please also renew this library. **Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes # **Special notes for your reviewer**: **Release note**: ```release-note ```
-
Kubernetes Submit Queue authored
Automatic merge from submit-queue Add SuccessfulMountVolume message to the events of pod **What this PR does / why we need it:** When creating a pod with volume, the volume mount may failed at first, but eventually succeed after retry several times. kubectl describe pod can only see the failed messages, so i think it will be better to add the SuccessfulMountVolume message to the pod events too. **Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes # Fixes #42867
-
Phillip Wittrock authored
Delete federation system namespace from all the federated clusters.
-
mbohlool authored
-
mbohlool authored
-
mbohlool authored
-
mbohlool authored
-
mbohlool authored
-
mbohlool authored
-
mbohlool authored
-
Madhusudan.C.S authored
This is part of the namespace deletion big hammer. `kubefed join` not just creates federation-system namespace, but also cluster role and cluster role bindings in the joining clusters. Sometimes unjoin fails to delete them. So we use a big hammer here to delete them. This smells like a real problem in kubefed and needs investigation. This is a short term fix to unblock the submit queue.
-
Madhusudan.C.S authored
This is a big hammer. `kubefed join` creates federation-system namespace in the joining clusters if they don't already exist. This namespace usually exists in the host cluster and hence cannot be deleted while unjoining. So in order to be safe, we don't delete the federation-system namespace from any federated cluster while unjoining them. This causes a problem in our test environment if certain resources are left in the namespace. Therefore we are deleting all federation-system namespace in all the clusters.
-
- 04 Jun, 2017 10 commits
-
-
Madhusudan.C.S authored
PV is a non-namespaced resource. Running `kubectl delete pv --all`, even with `--namespace` is going to delete all the PVs in the cluster. This is a dangerous operation and should not be deleted this way. Instead we now retrieve the PVs bound to the PVCs in the namespace we are deleteing and delete only those PVs. Fixes issue #46380.
-
Shyam Jeedigunta authored
-
Nick Sardo authored
-
Nick Sardo authored
-
Nick Sardo authored
-
Nick Sardo authored
-
Nick Sardo authored
-
Nick Sardo authored
-
Nick Sardo authored
-
Nick Sardo authored
-