Unverified Commit e36fa85e authored by Kubernetes Submit Queue's avatar Kubernetes Submit Queue Committed by GitHub

Merge pull request #62556 from msau42/fix-node-selector-term

Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>. Fix volume node affinity to OR node selector terms **What this PR does / why we need it**: Fixes node selector terms to be ORed, to be consistent with documentation and Pod.NodeAffinity. Also handles the "node selector term nil or empty matches nothing" behavior. **Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*: Fixes #62551 **Special notes for your reviewer**: **Release note**: ```release-note Fixes issue where PersistentVolume.NodeAffinity.NodeSelectorTerms were ANDed instead of ORed. ```
parents 0eb364a3 d2ab5f29
......@@ -283,10 +283,12 @@ func checkVolumeNodeAffinity(pv *v1.PersistentVolume, nodeLabels map[string]stri
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Failed to parse MatchExpressions: %v", err)
}
if !selector.Matches(labels.Set(nodeLabels)) {
return fmt.Errorf("NodeSelectorTerm %+v does not match node labels", term.MatchExpressions)
if selector.Matches(labels.Set(nodeLabels)) {
// Terms are ORed, so only one needs to match
return nil
}
}
return fmt.Errorf("No matching NodeSelectorTerms")
}
return nil
}
......
......@@ -66,7 +66,53 @@ func TestCheckVolumeNodeAffinity(t *testing.T) {
pv: testVolumeWithNodeAffinity(t, &v1.VolumeNodeAffinity{}),
},
{
name: "valid-constraints",
name: "select-nothing",
expectSuccess: false,
pv: testVolumeWithNodeAffinity(t, &v1.VolumeNodeAffinity{Required: &v1.NodeSelector{}}),
},
{
name: "select-nothing-empty-terms",
expectSuccess: false,
pv: testVolumeWithNodeAffinity(t, &v1.VolumeNodeAffinity{
Required: &v1.NodeSelector{
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
{
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{},
},
},
},
}),
},
{
name: "valid-multiple-terms",
expectSuccess: true,
pv: testVolumeWithNodeAffinity(t, &v1.VolumeNodeAffinity{
Required: &v1.NodeSelector{
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
{
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
{
Key: "test-key3",
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
Values: []string{"test-value1", "test-value3"},
},
},
},
{
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
{
Key: "test-key2",
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
Values: []string{"test-value0", "test-value2"},
},
},
},
},
},
}),
},
{
name: "valid-multiple-match-expressions",
expectSuccess: true,
pv: testVolumeWithNodeAffinity(t, &v1.VolumeNodeAffinity{
Required: &v1.NodeSelector{
......@@ -90,7 +136,7 @@ func TestCheckVolumeNodeAffinity(t *testing.T) {
}),
},
{
name: "invalid-key",
name: "invalid-multiple-match-expressions-key",
expectSuccess: false,
pv: testVolumeWithNodeAffinity(t, &v1.VolumeNodeAffinity{
Required: &v1.NodeSelector{
......@@ -114,7 +160,7 @@ func TestCheckVolumeNodeAffinity(t *testing.T) {
}),
},
{
name: "invalid-values",
name: "invalid-multiple-match-expressions-values",
expectSuccess: false,
pv: testVolumeWithNodeAffinity(t, &v1.VolumeNodeAffinity{
Required: &v1.NodeSelector{
......@@ -137,6 +183,34 @@ func TestCheckVolumeNodeAffinity(t *testing.T) {
},
}),
},
{
name: "invalid-multiple-terms",
expectSuccess: false,
pv: testVolumeWithNodeAffinity(t, &v1.VolumeNodeAffinity{
Required: &v1.NodeSelector{
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
{
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
{
Key: "test-key3",
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
Values: []string{"test-value1", "test-value3"},
},
},
},
{
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
{
Key: "test-key2",
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpIn,
Values: []string{"test-value0", "test-value1"},
},
},
},
},
},
}),
},
}
for _, c := range cases {
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment