Unverified Commit e270b8aa authored by Kubernetes Submit Queue's avatar Kubernetes Submit Queue Committed by GitHub

Merge pull request #63067 from k82cn/k8s_63027

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 62982, 63075, 63067, 62877, 63141). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>. Removed e2e test on empty NodeAffinity. Signed-off-by: 's avatarDa K. Ma <klaus1982.cn@gmail.com> **Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*: Fixes #63027 **Special notes for your reviewer**: In #62448, we removed the validation on empty `nodeAffinity` which is already handled in scheduler: select no objects. **Release note**: ```release-note None ```
parents 97287177 793ed987
......@@ -6582,6 +6582,31 @@ func TestValidatePod(t *testing.T) {
}),
},
},
"invalid node selector requirement in node affinity, key is invalid": {
expectedError: "spec.affinity.nodeAffinity.requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.nodeSelectorTerms[0].matchExpressions[0].key",
spec: core.Pod{
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: "123",
Namespace: "ns",
},
Spec: validPodSpec(&core.Affinity{
NodeAffinity: &core.NodeAffinity{
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: &core.NodeSelector{
NodeSelectorTerms: []core.NodeSelectorTerm{
{
MatchExpressions: []core.NodeSelectorRequirement{
{
Key: "invalid key ___@#",
Operator: core.NodeSelectorOpExists,
},
},
},
},
},
},
}),
},
},
"invalid node field selector requirement in node affinity, more values for field selector": {
expectedError: "spec.affinity.nodeAffinity.requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution.nodeSelectorTerms[0].matchFields[0].values",
spec: core.Pod{
......
......@@ -1359,6 +1359,34 @@ func TestPodFitsSelector(t *testing.T) {
test: "Pod with an Affinity matches node's labels but the PodSpec.NodeSelector(the old thing that we are deprecating) " +
"is not satisfied, won't schedule onto the node",
},
{
pod: &v1.Pod{
Spec: v1.PodSpec{
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
NodeAffinity: &v1.NodeAffinity{
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: &v1.NodeSelector{
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
{
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{
{
Key: "foo",
Operator: v1.NodeSelectorOpNotIn,
Values: []string{"invalid value: ___@#$%^"},
},
},
},
},
},
},
},
},
},
labels: map[string]string{
"foo": "bar",
},
fits: false,
test: "Pod with an invalid value in Affinity term won't be scheduled onto the node",
},
}
expectedFailureReasons := []algorithm.PredicateFailureReason{ErrNodeSelectorNotMatch}
......
......@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ import (
"time"
"k8s.io/api/core/v1"
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/errors"
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource"
metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/labels"
......@@ -367,29 +366,6 @@ var _ = SIGDescribe("SchedulerPredicates [Serial]", func() {
verifyResult(cs, 0, 1, ns)
})
It("validates that a pod with an invalid NodeAffinity is rejected", func() {
By("Trying to launch a pod with an invalid Affinity data.")
podName := "without-label"
_, err := cs.CoreV1().Pods(ns).Create(initPausePod(f, pausePodConfig{
Name: podName,
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
NodeAffinity: &v1.NodeAffinity{
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: &v1.NodeSelector{
NodeSelectorTerms: []v1.NodeSelectorTerm{
{
MatchExpressions: []v1.NodeSelectorRequirement{},
},
},
},
},
},
}))
if err == nil || !errors.IsInvalid(err) {
framework.Failf("Expect error of invalid, got : %v", err)
}
})
/*
Testname: scheduler-node-selector-matching
Description: Ensure that scheduler respects the NodeSelector field
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment